School District Backs Fight to Raise State Funding

The chairman proposed that the committee hold a joint meeting with other communities that are underfunded by the state.


Chairman Jacqueline Kinney declared it is time for Swampscott “to take the gloves off” in fighting the state to raise its annual distribution to the town's schools.

Committee member Rick Kraft said that is meeting with similar committees in Nahant and Saugus on March 6 to discuss ways to persuade the state to increase funding for their schools. Marblehead's finance committee may also join the meeting, committee members said.

Swampscott is funded below the 17.5 percent of its budget that is required by law, Kraft said. He estimated that the state shorted the district by $800,000 this year and $4.6 million over the last six years.

“We are trying to put more visibility on this issue,” Kinney said. “Let's really shine a spotlight on it.”

She proposed that the school committee hold a joint meeting with other communities that are facing the same under-funding by the state to develop a strategy.

State Senator Thomas McGee, D-Lynn, and state Rep. Lori Ehrlich, D-Marblehead, have been working on the issue. But they need to have the towns and cities lobbying too, Kraft said.

The state has traditionally funded a much higher percentage of school budgets in less wealthy cities and towns. By law, it is required to fund every school district at the 17.5 percent level, but has not.

Seven years ago, the state began to increase the funding for wealthier school districts, working toward the state minimum. But over the last two years the state funding has started to drop again, Kraft said.

“Swampscott is losing ground,” Kraft said. “I don't know how the state can flaunt the law.”

Swampscott is funded at the lowest levels among school districts, he said.

The committee had scheduled a briefing by former committee member David Whelan on the issue of Chapter 70 state funding, but was forced to postpone the presentation until next month because of an illness.

The committee has set March 14 as the public hearing on the new budget. All are invited to attend.

David Whelan February 16, 2012 at 04:08 PM
Lou: You said, "The state will take care of the poor towns and cities first." Would those poor towns include Brookline, Westwood, Marblehead, Lincoln Sudbury, Newton, Wellesley, Needham, Hingham, Winchester, and Manchester-Essex? I ask because those "poor towns" (and cities) get more funding per child than Swampscott.
Neil Donnenfeld February 16, 2012 at 06:25 PM
Kudos to all those who are raising awareness of this problem. Swampscott has been getting short changed for too long. Where are our State Senator and Representative? Why has this been allowed to go on for so long? If they can't get it done on there own, we need our leaders to tell us, their constituents, what they need us to do to get results.
Marianne Hartmann February 16, 2012 at 11:00 PM
I am surprised that there has not been a class action suit against the state by angry parents. Our kids are not getting what is legaly due to them for the best possible education.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something