patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

The 64-Gallon Question

Three months after its introduction, Swampscott residents have embraced the new waste reduction program and the Town is beginning to reap the benefits.

Swampscott’s curbside recycling rate which was stagnant at 17% for the past 5 years has risen to 24% in the three months since the program’s start. This translates into less trash, which means less costs to the Town*, and most importantly a keener fiscal responsibility with our tax dollars. (*The cost to process a ton of our recyclables is flat; the cost to dispose of our trash is $83/ton.)

Initially, as expected, some confusion arose concerning the use of ‘large’ barrels – such as those which are 64 gallons in size.

For those still asking the ’64-gallon question,’ please read on.

Although ‘large’ barrels (defined as greater than 35 gallons in size) are readily available for purchase, they were never meant to be manually hauled.  In fact, most are designed for heavy loads and used with automated collection trucks.

Thirty-five gallon containers are considered the largest container that a hauler can safely lift, repetitively. Many communities including Salem, Hamilton, Peabody, Lynn, and Ipswich banned the use of these large barrels when adopting their waste reduction policies.

Residents in Swampscott have been encouraged to use barrels no larger than 35 gallons, for the reason above.  Using this size, loose trash and any number of small trash bags may be placed into these containers, up to 50 pounds in each.  Likewise, 30-gallon trash bags may be filled up to 50 pounds. (Each household is allowed three containers per week - 35 gallon barrels or bags 30 gallons or less.)

However, there is an exception to the 35 gallon barrel. Recognizing that some residents own ‘large’ 50- and 64-gallon barrels, these barrels are allowed with 2 conditions: First, no loose trash can be placed into barrels larger than 35 gallons. In other words all trash needs to be bagged when placed in a ‘large’ barrel. Why? Because, as mentioned above, large barrels are not manually dumped, instead haulers retrieve individual bags from them. Secondly, since the haulers are not determining trash volume at the curb, only the number of acceptable containers, it may be necessary to put a couple of small kitchen bags into a larger bag to be within the allowance. To avoid these nuances, just use 35 gallon barrels. Your ‘large’ barrel can easily be repurposed for recyclables such as cardboard or plastics and cans.

Although Swampscott residents have been educated about recycling for twenty years, it took a waste reduction policy to nudge the recycling rate along. These small individual efforts to reduce trash add up and will lessen the unnecessary consumption of our tax dollars for trash services, both now and in the future.

Citizen Swamp

2:33 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

How about using dollar figures in this analysis, how much have we saved in three months?

Reply

David Whelan

3:36 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

I would be nice to know who wrote the story.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Terry Date

9:31 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Hi David,
This is a blog that was moved up to a story slot. We did the same with another blog on the 64 gallon topic, by Olaf.
We have organizations and groups that blog under the group or organization's name.
Our stories usually have bylines but we welcome blogs by organizations and committees whose members might share in the blogging.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Whelan

8:08 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Who is the organization and are they representing an appointed or elected board? At least with Olaf's story I knew who the author was.

Citizen Swamp

8:22 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

"Although Swampscott residents have been educated about recycling for twenty years, it took a waste reduction policy to nudge the recycling rate along."
More lecturing from "Swampscott Recycles"

Reply

Neil Petrocelli

8:38 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

It is a shame that both the recycling company and the waste disposal company are a bunch of prima donnas when it comes to taking what is curbside. Many times I have had to pull it back and then throw it out again the following week. How about the large recycle trash barrels instead of the bins? Wouldn't they be more useful and encourage more recycling?

Reply

Swampscott Recycles

11:18 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Many people use a spare barrel for recycling. They are readily accepted, provided they aren't over 50 pounds and should be clearly marked 'recycling.' Actually we learned the haulers prefer the bins, this way they quickly look inside, and can leave behind items that are not accepted. This provides a purer stock. Swampscott is looking into obtaining a larger bin, but haven't found a durable one yet.

Reply

Buzz

1:51 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

I love how I'll leave bundled cardboard out...about 1 in 4 times they don't pick it up. I drag it back into my garage and repeat next week. These recycle drivers don't pay attention about 25% of the time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Swampscott Recycles

7:49 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

I wonder why. Is the cardboard waxed (not accepted), larger than 4'x4' (won't fit in the hopper), heavier than 50 lbs, or have metal or wooden pieces attached (not accepted)? If any of these are true, the material may need to be rebundled.

Whisky

5:35 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

No need to be so infatuated by bins and barrels. We use paper trash bags for all of our recycling and have never had a problem.

Reply

Leave a comment