Tenth Anniversary of the Iraq War: The North Shore Reflects
Today marks the 10th anniversary of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. How did the conflict affect your family?
Ten years ago today U.S. forces led the invasion of Iraq.
President Barack Obama took the troops out of Iraq a year ago, leaving the country "teetering between progress and chaos," according to a Washington Post overview. But whatever the outcomes of the war in Iraq itself, the conflict certainly had its effects here on the North Shore.
Those consequences can be seen most clearly in the young men and women from North Shore towns who fought in Iraq — and died there.
Two Swampscott High graduates, Army Specialist Jared Raymond and Marine Capt. Jennifer Harris, both lost their lives in the war. Wakefield's Army Staff Sgt. Joseph Bellavia also died in Iraq. Army Sgt. Benjamin Mejia, of Salem, is among the North Shore casualties of the conflict.
Aside from those who lost their lives in Iraq, many more people served their country and returned home to the North Shore. Count among them Nathan Gray of Lynn, an Iraq war veteran recently profiled in the Item for the landscaping business he started. And Patch covered joyous events, too, like the Thanksgiving visit home to Swampscott of Navy pilot James Morrison, who flew missions in Iraq.
But the U.S. has an all-volunteer military, leaving the vast majority of families without a loved one in harm's way. Even for these families, the Iraq War is certainly an historic event.
How did the war affect you and your family? What impact did it have on your town? Share your thoughts with other North Shore residents in the comments below.
marc bowlen
10:28 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
I think we lost that war? The government ran up billions of dollars of debt that was added to trillions of dollars of debt! There were no weapons of mass destruction and The Iraq's haven't reimbursed us one penny for what we did for them, not even a free barrel of oil! The cost of fuel is higher now than ever and Iraq and its neighbor Kuwait are free because of this country and American taxpayers who foot the bill for this! We can forget the enemies overseas because the enemy is here in Washington D.C. These tyrants in government are just as bad as Saddam Hussein or Osama Bin Ladin were!
DreamJeannie
1:25 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
I, along with hundreds of thousands of other people, spent countless hours protesting the invasion and occupation of Iraq before it started, knowing full well it was wrong. Unfortunately, however, Bush, Cheney and the other armchair warmongers were going to have their war even if meant outright lying and producing phony documents to the world. It’s still hard to believe that the U.S. would attack another sovereign nation, but to do so based on false pretenses is nothing short of criminal. So here we are, ten deadly years later, a trillion dollars wasted, over 4000 American Soldiers dead (mostly young soldiers, all of whom should still have their entire lives ahead of them to live out their dreams), and potentially as many as one million Iraqis killed (remember the U.S. doesn’t do body counts on countries we attack, according to Donald Rumsfeld), and NOTHING has been accomplished. And sadly, as innocent people continue to die or be maimed in a war that should never have been started to begin with, the majority of American people go shopping at the mall.
Michael Quinlan
8:27 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013
We did turn to occupation over to the State Department six months after the start. Chaos ensued.
Nameless Conservative
8:59 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013
Let's all just forget the FACT that Bush properly put the question of war to the branch of government Constitutionally authorized to declare one - CONGRESS - which did so with a MAJORITY of democrats in the Senate. Want a list of all ~those~ "war mongers"?
[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.” — From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998
“Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement.” — Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002
“Saddam Hussein’s regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal.” — John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002
et cetera ...
Pffft!
Nameless Conservative
9:11 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013
29 Senate Democrats who all say that Bush fooled them into declaring war on Iraq Friday, October 11, 2002:
1. Christopher Dodd
2. Joseph Biden
3. Max Cleland
4. Evan Bayh
5. John Breaux
6. Jean Carnahan
7. Max Baucus
8. Hillary Clinton
9. John Edwards
10. Ernest "Fritz" Hollings
11. Thomas Daschle
12. Maria Cantwell
13. Blanche Lincoln
14. Dianne Feinstein
15. Joseph Lieberman
16. Thomas Carper
17. Bill Nelson
18. Zell Miller
19. Tom Harkin
20. Mary Landrieu
21. John Kerry
22. Ben Nelson
23. Harry Reid
24. Robert Torricelli
25. Charles Schumer
26. Byron Dorgan
27. Tim Johnson
28. Jay Rockefeller
29. Herb Kohl
(The other 21 democrats were smarter than Bush and couldn't be fooled.)
Sean Ward
10:09 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
I wonder, if the 182,000 Kurdish victims of Hussein's genocide from 1986 and 1989 would think that we wasted our time, lives and money going to Iraq if they were alive.
I wonder, if we had finished the job the first time we went there in 1991 would 9/11 have happened? Would we have had to go back in 2003? Would we have lost 4000 more more soldiers, spent trillions more dollars? How many more innocent defenseless Iraqis would have been tortured, raped and killed by Hussein and his band of thugs?
I wonder, how many more wars we would have won in the past 60 years if it weren't for television showing the American public the horrors of war. Was this public outcry the reason we lost in Vietnam? Was it the reason we didn't finish the job in Iraq in 1991? Would we have suffered 9/11 and the second war in Iraq if it weren't for this public outcry?
Sean Ward
10:15 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
I wonder, how many more Jews, Gypsies and gays would have been murdered by Hitler if we had televised WWII and let public outcry pull our troops out of the war shortly after landing on Normandy?
I wonder, did the 13,000,000 murdered Jews in Germany teach us what happens when we stand by and do nothing while a dictator like Hitler, or Saddam Hussein, hides behind the Sovereignty of their country and commits atrocities against mankind as a whole?
Nameless Conservative
8:28 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013
Well .. I really don't think there would have been any significant public outcry. We were a nation determined to win back then - and proud to make the sacrifices we did in order to do it. One justifiable outcry however would have been against FDR selling out at the Yalta conference agreeing to let the Soviets to rape Berlin, (and Poland), in exchange for Soviet help with Japan. Out of ~100,000 German women raped, about 10,000 of them committed suicide. (not all US troops were angels either, many sold food for 'favors'..)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2002/may/01/news.features11
Nameless Conservative
7:07 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013
Remember Harry Reid's inspirational message to the troops - "This war is lost."
Outcome of the war is that Saddam is dead, Iraq is no longer a threat and that ex ambassador Joe Wilson is a colossal lying political whore. (Oh, but we scored Scooter Libby for 'lying' what flavor syrup he put on his pancakes 3 years ago..)
Michael Quinlan
8:29 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013
'But the U.S. has an all-volunteer military, leaving the vast majority of families without a loved one in harm's way. Even for these families, the Iraq War is certainly an historic event.' This is a classic example of progressive bias at the Patch.
DreamJeannie
11:58 am on Friday, March 22, 2013
First of all, Saddam Hussein was NEVER a threat to the United States and had NOTHING to do with 9/11! These Bush lies have been debunked one hundred times over. I guess you didn't get the memo. How sad and pathetic that you're still acting as cheerleaders for this bogus war. Amazing! Of course, not everyone has lost--Halliburton has made billions and billions in profits with their no-bid contracts. You have to love their motto: "profits before people." Perhaps you can incorporate that motto into one of your cheers! And of course it was just a mere coincidence that Dick Cheney had financial ties to the war profiteers. Sure it was! There is one thing M. Quinlan and I can both agree on--the Iraq war is indeed a historic event--as in the biggest foreign policy blunder of all time! What a disgrace!
Sean Ward
6:58 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013
When I became a US Marine in 1991 I didn't do it just to protect the United States. I joined because I believe that ALL humanity deserves a life free from torture, oppression, abuse, rape and murder. For me as a Marine there didn't need to be a threat to the US. He was beating, raping and killing women and children in his own country. Marines believe in protecting the defenseless regardless of whether they were fortunate enough to be born in America. Shame on you for turning a blind eye on children because they aren't from your country.
As for Iraq having nothing to do with 9/11, go back and look at your history. Iraq was a known supporter of terrorism. His invasion of Kuwait emboldened bin Laden and radicalized Muslims across the entire middle east. Saddam Hussein’s dictatorship provided headquarters, operating bases, training camps, and other support to terrorist groups fighting the governments of neighboring Turkey and Iran including some with ties to Al-Qaeda. This is like saying Germany had nothing to do with Japan bombing Pearl Harbor.
You can think and say whatever you want. I served as a Marine to protect that right for you. It's unfortunate that the killing of hundreds of thousands of innocents is insufficient cause for the US and the rest of the UN to intercede with force. The American public has to be shown the threat to themselves before they can approve the of helping other non-American humans in need of defense.
DreamJeannie
1:51 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
Well, thank goodness, not all Marines believe all of the lies and propaganda that brought us into this unnecessary war! I agree that ALL humanity deserves a life free from torture, oppression, abuse, rape and murder. However, waging war brings those exact horrors, which is why it's WRONG. Does Guantanomo ring any bells? It's a sad day for all Americans when our highest elected officials are promoting and implementing the use of torture. And I hope you have enough storage space for all of the thank you letters you must be receiving from the Iraqi people for obliterating (oh, excuse me--I meant liberating) their country.
Nameless Conservative
4:25 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
Here, dispute this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_graves_in_Iraq
You can actually compare that to denying some sort of amenity to an inmate at Guantanomo?
I'd rather be water-boarding than trying to explain the difference to someone who will never accept the truth that invading Iraq had BIPARTISAN SUPPORT in Congress who authorized the war by a wide margin. It absolutely was not "Bush's war", I can cite quote after quote democrats rattling a sabre at Saddam during Clinton's term and just before the 2003 invasion.
Did Obama seek Congressional authorization in Libya? ... No! Running guns to Syrian rebels? No!
Clinton's bombing of Serbia? No! (Where are the 'thousands' in mass graves that he told us about or evidence of 'genocide' he claimed? ) www.aim.org/aim-column/clintons-kosovo-whopper/
Versus - http://www.fhsclassmates.com/images/iraqvote3.jpg
Sean Ward
8:44 pm on Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Guantanamo does ring some bells. The is where we brought the animals that believe women are second hand citizens and committed terrorist atrocities against both our people and their own in the name of their religion. It's where we brought people that had violated every possible civil right of innocent women, children and men to protect all of society against their future crimes. And despite their complete disregard for the human rights of their victims you would have them better treated? I know your type. It doesn't matter why a war is waged or who started it. You are against all war. I'm against all war too. But I'm not so naïve as to think it's never necessary. Torture, like war, is a terrible thing. But I've watched what you consider torture and I can tell you it's no different than what we call training when becoming a Marine. This is no torture. If you want to see real torture watch how those same inmates treat their captives. They know how to actually torture. Instead of water boarding and humiliation they rape, dismember, cut, beat and eventually behead and violate the dead bodies of their victims. I don't see you complaining about that. Sometimes you have to do bad things to prevent worse things.
marc bowlen
2:23 am on Friday, March 29, 2013
Sean Ward, you are against all torture, murder and genocide? Maybe your Marines should look at your American Government! Remember Waco, TX 1993? How many women and children were burned alive by the government in your country America! And the torture they had to endure for 60 days with the helicopters and speakers and loud noise they pumped in to the church compound because the government didn't like 1 man? I'd worry about this country 1st before gutter slums with no civilization like Iraq and Afghanistan! Oh by the way The United States government was responsible for 911 and Saddam Hussein because it was America who supplied Saddam with weapons and aid during the Iran- Iraq war and this country supplied arms and support to Osama Bin Laden in his war with the Soviets! The United States government wants to control the world economy and they want to enslave all Americans by taxing everything we do in life! Forget about the enemy overseas, the enemy is here!
DreamJeannie
11:00 am on Friday, March 29, 2013
Sean, you really want to defend Guantanamo? Seriously? Indefinite detentions of the innocent and the guilty without charges, torture, humiliation, and other abuses. Imagine the reverse scenario--would this be acceptable treatment to our soldiers if they were captured by the enemy? I don’t think so. The U.S. would be crying war crimes in a New York minute, and rightfully so! Another disgrace the unnecessary Iraq and Afghanistan wars have brought us is the CIA’s first known assassination by drone, giving Bush the distinguished title of “Assassin-in-Chief” in 2002. How about the first Afghan wedding party to be wiped out by the U.S. Military? Do recall in late December 2001, a B-52 and two B-1B bombers, using precision-guided weapons, eradicated a village of celebrants in eastern Afghanistan; only two of 112 villagers reportedly survived. The same happened in Iraq when a U.S. airstrike took out wedding celebrants in the western Iraqi desert, killing more than 40 of them. Just collateral damage? Acceptable? Again, I don’t think so.
Michael Quinlan
1:17 pm on Friday, March 29, 2013
Are you complaining about the effectiveness of America's precision weapons? Less than 2% survivability is a high standard but we are Americans and WE CAN DO BETTER! Do you think our drone strikes are a better method?