Brown Should Focus on Economy to Beat Warren, Mass. Republicans Say
After three polls released last week showed Elizabeth Warren ahead of Scott Brown, and another showed Brown ahead of Warren, Patch surveyed influential Massachusetts Republicans to get their take on the tight race.
Republican Sen. Scott Brown should focus on the economy during the final stretch of his campaign to fend off Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren's rise in the polls: that's the main finding of this week's Red Commonwealth survey of influential Massachusetts Republicans.
Three polls by three separate polling organizations showing Warren ahead of Brown – but barely – were released early last week.
Further illustrating how tight the race has become, hours after Patch sent the survey out to Massachusetts Republicans, another poll by UMass Lowell and the Boston Herald showed Brown ahead of Warren by 6 points, with a 5.5 percent margin of error, after an UMass Lowell/Herald poll nine months ago had Warren leading by 7.
A majority of influential Massachusetts Republicans surveyed, 58.6 percent, said that Warren's reported rise in the polls is most likely attributable to a post-Democratic National Convention bump that energized Democrats and left-leaning independents, while a few questioned the validity of the polls themselves.
Those surveyed were split on the efficacy of Brown's get-out-the-vote organization compared to Warren's, with 34.5 percent saying it's "somewhat worse" than Warren's, 27.6 saying "no advantage for either," 13.8 percent saying "somewhat better" and 17.2 percent saying "much better."
Focus on Obamacare and Medicare with Seniors, Economy with Women
Warren led Brown among voters 65 and older by 63-35 in the poll results released last week by Western New England University (WNEU)'s Polling Institute. Asked what they would recommend the Brown campaign do to increase support among seniors, many of the influential Massachusetts Republicans who responded to the survey said Brown should focus on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, colloquially known as Obamacare, and Medicare.
"Drive home the point that Obamacare must be repealed in order to void the billions of dollars taken from Medicare in order to pay for Obamacare & that Brown – not Warren – will carry out that fight," one respondent wrote.
The WNEU poll also showed Brown leading Warren among male voters 49-44, while Warren led among female voters in the same poll 55-40. Asked which strategy Brown should focus on regarding the gender gap, 62.1 percent said that Brown should try to make gains among female voters.
Asked how Brown could win over more female voters, respondents said that the incumbent should push back against the 'War on Women' theme used by Warren's campaign and continue to define himself as "pro-choice," while many said that the senator should look past demographic issues and focus on the economy, jobs and tax policies that affect everyone equally.
"I am a woman, but I'm far more sophisticated, as most women are, to buy into belittling 'women's issues,'" one respondent wrote. "We, men and women, are concerned about the economic future of ourselves and our country. That unites all of us."
Economy Should Take Precedence
Asked what should be the primary issue that Brown should focus on during the final stretch of the campaign, a number of survey respondents said that Brown should go after Warren for her public image, which one respondent described as "an arrogant, lecturing, smarter-than-you college professor," and for her views described as "radicalism" and "extreme Leftist, anti-business."
However, most of the Mass. Republicans surveyed said that the economy should take precedent, with Brown contrasting his views with Warren's.
"We need jobs, we need to cut the size of government," one respondent wrote. "We need to get the deficit and debt under control. We need to stop demonizing job creators and investors. And we need lower taxes that will in turn produce economic growth and will result in an increase in revenues."
Brown and Warren had their first debate of four last week and almost all of the respondents leaned towards the debates deciding the race, with 62.1 somewhat agreeing it would be the deciding factor in the race and 31 percent strongly agreeing.
With regard to polling numbers, one respondent cautioned to view any results before the election with a skeptical eye.
"Keep in mind how the Boston Globe poll had Brown written off as a 15-point loser a week ahead of the special election in January 2010," the respondent wrote. "The only poll that really counts takes place on Nov. 6."
Red and Blue Commonwealth Survey
Our surveys are not a scientific, random sample of any larger population, but rather an effort to listen to a group of influential local Republican and Democratic activists, party leaders, candidates and elected officials in Massachusetts. All of these individuals have agreed to participate in Massachusetts’ Patch surveys, although not all responded to this story’s questions. Answers have been edited for style, but not for content.
Patch will be conducting Red Commonwealth and Blue Commonwealth surveys throughout the 2012 election season in hopes of determining the true sentiment of conservatives and progressives on the ground in Massachusetts. If you are an activist, party leader or elected official and would like to take part in periodic surveys that last just a few minutes, contact Associate Regional Editor Daniel DeMaina at danield@patch.com.
Note: This article is published across multiple Patch sites in the area.
Bob Samson
6:39 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Brown should focus on the lack of Job Creation by Obama.
gene
2:02 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Lack of job creation? President Obama has created more jobs in 3/12 years then George W. Bush did in 8 years
Candy Sweets
3:32 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
scott brown is running for president? thanks for the update.
Saber Walsh
7:15 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Brown is not running against Obama, he's running against Warren. If he were running against Obama he would have a "target rich environment" of issues/challenges where our President totally fell flat.
His fight against Warren is about fighting demagoguery. I don't like Brown, but he's voted exactly as he said he would. He's really a conservative Democrat, and in the land where socialism is now firmly planted in our government, I'd take a conservative Democrat over an elitist academician former-lawyer liberal who just can't seem to get enough "suck up to the unions" ads on TV.
NaemhOisin
9:22 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Elizabeth Warren is a fraud and if elected, will be in excellent company in this state. I remember hearing Scott Brown on talk radio back when he was a state legislator from Wrentham and seemingly a lot more conservative than the politician he has since become. I'm not a fan of either but will cast a vote for the lesser of 'two evils'. As a conservative traditionalist with 'zero to none' representation, I expect a Warren victory but hope to On High for a Barack Obama defeat.
Bonnie H.
10:27 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Just knowing she is from Cambridge... isn't that enough?
Gail
10:30 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
Cambridge happens to be a very nice community with a lot of very intelligent people in it. That's probably why GOPers don't like it.
pcd
1:07 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
She is not from Cambridge...she isn't even from MA. She is woman who will do what ever it takes to better herself and doesn't give a rat's a*s about the people of Massachusetts. All she cares about is getting elected and jumping on the national stage.
Debbie M.
4:24 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Spot on pcd
Alex
11:17 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
And don't forget that she supports illegal immigration.
Gail
11:25 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Elizabeth Warren does not support illegal immigration!
Alex
10:13 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012
To Gail: Are you kidding?
Candy Sweets
3:32 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Maybe Scott Brown should step up his campaign if he wants to win.
Heidi-Jean F. Rossicone
3:57 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Did anyone see Elizabeth Warren's hired "clappers" in the Independence Day parade? What a strange feeling that was. Maybe they weren't hired. It was a cult like feeling they gave however.
John Castelluccio
4:15 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
hammergjh, please feel free to re-post your comment, but without the crude language.
Debbie M.
4:23 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Warren is a fake. Vote Brown.
Candy Sweets
5:52 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
they are all fake
Chevy Chase
10:47 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
If we go back to Reagan, he would never be elected today (and I voted for him twice) because he was too liberal by today's Republican standards. Given how far right the party has shifted, I really question what limited power Brown can have or influence given his wishy washy stance on most issues. I frankly don't care if Warren is of English, German, or Japanese heritage. It doesn't matter unless you're worried about the Native American swing vote. At least you know where she will vote and given her loyalty to the party will provide her with more say within the party and ultimately Washington.
Gail
10:28 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
People are trying to distract from the real issues with the silly attacks on Warren's heritage. If Scott Brown had to actually answer for his voting record he would lose for sure.
Heidi-Jean F. Rossicone
12:33 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
How do you know anything about what she will vote if she lies blatantly from the get go? I personally do care. Brown has been the most bi-partisan voter we have seen. He's the man. And you know what? Everyone seems to know it.
Mickey D
6:57 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
Heidi-Jean, you say "she lies blatantly" but can you prove a single instance? Scott Brown is a nice guy but he is a party hack when it comes right down to it. He will do what Mitch (Mr. Obstructionist) McConnell LETS him do, and nothing more!
Gail
10:28 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
Got proof that she lies blatantly? Brown is only bipartisan because he is running for reelection after just two years in office. He's in the pocket of Mitch McConnell and their corporate backers.
Alex
11:21 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Proof of Warren's lying? One has to be blind and deaf not to know at least some of the instances.
Carl Reppucci
4:23 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
Patrick endorses Warren, Patrick endorses cops being paid while not working (read Eagle Tribune). By association alone Warren is a crook. She is not taking a pay cut to cut the cost of college for students and she works more than one job taking money.
Is she rich? Does she make over $250000? What does she pay in taxes?
Carl Reppucci
4:25 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
Bet Warren doesn't mind paying a 1% meals tax like poor people who buy a precooked chicken at Market Basket do after working two jobs to feed a family.
Carl Reppucci
4:26 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
She hasn't stopped wasteful spending, she hasn't stopped meals taxes, trash taxes or any other tax - she is tax and spend.